Which reasoning method is characterized by drawing conclusions from general facts?

Deductive reasoning is a method where conclusions are drawn from general facts or premises. In this approach, one starts with a general statement or hypothesis and applies it to specific cases to reach a conclusion. For instance, if it is established that "all humans are mortal" (general fact), and "Socrates is a human," then one can deduce that "Socrates is mortal." This process emphasizes the logical structure and the necessity of the conclusion being true if the premises are true.

In contrast, inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, which does not guarantee that the conclusion will always hold true. Critical reasoning focuses more on evaluating arguments and assessing the credibility of information. Analytical reasoning typically involves breaking down complex problems into smaller parts for better understanding and solutions, which may not lead to universally applicable conclusions. Therefore, deductive reasoning is the most appropriate method characterized by moving from general facts to specific conclusions.